Search for: "STATE v. STRONG"
Results 81 - 100
of 16,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 4:24 pm
Did the trial court err in refusing to ask during voir dire if any member of the jury panel had “strong feelings” about the crime with which appellant was charged? [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:08 pm
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Strong feelings against pornography Abe Arjun Mallik was convicted of 11 counts of possession of child pornography following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Frederick County.1 He raises five questions for our review, which we have edited for clarity and brevity: 1. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Instead of resolving the conflict, the Court conspicuously evaded the issue.Part IV discusses the spread of residential segregation laws in the South and border states during the 1910s, and the support these laws found in contemporary law reviews.This Article next focuses on Buchanan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
"); Townley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:00 pm
Oscar Longoria has filed HB 1790, which would allow state jail felons who successfully complete probation to have their convictions reduced to a class A misdemeanor.The bill, which excludes assaults and other "crimes against persons" (Title V of the Penal Code) will help alleviate state jail populations, reduce prisoner healthcare costs and encourage state jail defendants to take probation terms seriously, including restitution for victims. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:52 am
” Ajamian v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 1:23 pm
Kerik v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
Pompey Industry v ECU-Line N.V. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:21 am
The decision was six to three, featuring strong dissents by Brandeis, McReynolds, and Holmes. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:21 am
The decision was six to three, featuring strong dissents by Brandeis, McReynolds, and Holmes. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
I am honored to reproduce today’s editorial in the Buffalo News concurring in my views and recommendations for a strong concussion management program in New York Sate. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
The issue in Solvay v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
As Hoffer details Hamilton's arguments for the supremacy of treaty law over state law, the significance of Rutgers v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The request was made pursuant to Article 31.6 state-to-state dispute resolution provisions available when a CUSMA party’s rights have been nullified or impaired.[4] Despite strong U.S. pressure during CUSMA negotiations to eliminate import restrictions that are essential to the functioning of the supply management system, Canada was successful in pushing back. [read post]
