Search for: "Sands v. Harms" Results 81 - 100 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Expert witness opinions about the nature and cause of plaintiffs’ medical conditions, are the linchpin of mass tort cases involving claims of bodily injury from allegedly harmful products. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:22 am
The purpose is neither to punish, nor to analyse the harm done to goodwill, but to remove any unjust enrichment attributable to the improper profit made by the tortfeasor. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 7:23 am by Adrian Vermeule
Seminole Rock & Sand Co. should be overruled, the first question in the certiorari petition and the only one the court granted. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:54 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
25 years ago today, when the United States Supreme Court dealt a blow to fairness in the death penalty with its ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Restatement Approach The American Law Institute’s Restatement (Second) of Torts [Restatement] restated the rules for guiding the applicability for apportionment in a section entitled “Apportionment of Harm to Causes” (1) Damages for harm are to be apportioned among two or more causes where (a) there are distinct harms, or (b) there is a reasonable basis for determining the contribution of each cause to a single harm. (2) Damages for any other… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:08 pm by David Doniger
  The Supreme Court upheld this authority in its landmark 2007 global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
” The first case Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd and Others v. [read post]