Search for: "Schering Corp"
Results 81 - 100
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am
Apotex Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:11 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,301. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
Schering-Plough Corp., No. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
Schering-Plough Corp., No. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:01 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 2011 WL 3452398 (Cal.App. 2 Dist.) [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:51 pm
Posted by Todd DawsonHaving already struck out on a curveball they thought was a fastball over the middle of the plate, Schering Corp. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:56 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 367 N.J. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:40 am
See Schering Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:08 am
Neutrogena Corp., 2011 WL 2312569 (D. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:09 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, involves a settlement between Schering-Plough Corp., which owned a key patent (now expired) for the high blood pressure medication K-Dur 20, and generic drug makers Upsher Smith and ESI (formerly a division of Wyeth). [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld in Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:20 pm
This case is an antitrust challenge to an agreement settling patent litigation between defendant-appellee Schering-Plough Corp.2 ("Schering") and defendant-appellee Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 10:51 am
Merck merged with Schering-Plough Corp. on Nov. 3, 2009, and, according to the complaint, had told PETA that they needed to prove ownership in Schering-Plough to be eligible. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
See Schering Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:37 am
See Schering Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
See Lampi Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
See Schering Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:52 pm
., Schering Corp. and Warrick Pharmaceuticals [...] [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:25 pm
Two pharmaceutical giants - Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Schering Corp - may have exhausted their legal remedies to fight the Second Circuit's decision. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm
FMC Corp., 569 F.3d 1335, 1349-50 (Fed. [read post]
