Search for: "Self v. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 1,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2021, 9:19 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
Smith, worked for the respondent, Pimlico Plumbers between 2005 and 2011, and was considered throughout the six year period to be self-employed independent contractor. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm by Edward A. Fallone
The majority allows the plaintiff to self-declare the existence of a substantial burden. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am by John-Paul Boyd
” “Self-represented litigants should be banned. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
The shameless self-promotion department has been working overtime. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
In its 2-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 1:29 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
The claim in R B v Smith was based on an alleged failure by a surgeon (who performed a laparoscopic hernia repair on the appellant) to provide the appellant with sufficient information to enable her to give informed consent for the surgery which resulted in colon perforation. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am by Fenella Keymer, Olswang LLP
The case of Firthglow Ltd (t/a) Protectacoat) v Szilagyi [2009] EWCA Civ 98 is also relied upon by Lord Clarke- in particular the finding of Smith LJ that, “The court has to consider whether or not the words of the written contract represent the true intentions or expectations of the parties. [read post]