Search for: "Shirk v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2009) (“Critically, it is the infringing act— making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing—that must be within (or into) the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I was reminded of all this by Francis Pileggi's post on a recent Delaware case, Hampshire Group, Limited v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The lower federal courts held that abstention was proper and the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The lower federal courts held that abstention was proper and the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:02 pm
The New York Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, recently issued an opinion in the case captioned, People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:39 am
But the fun comes with the full title: United States of America, Plaintiff, v. [read post]