Search for: "Short v. Short"
Results 81 - 100
of 33,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
However, the Order stops short of designating BIAS as a “supported service” under the USF: “Rather than adjust our USF rules on a piecemeal basis, retaining existing supported universal services and, by extension, ETC eligibility standards, provides us the flexibility for holistically examining reclassification’s effects on the USF at a later time. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:00 am
Fort de l’analyse de réunions et documents de l’OIM, l’ouvrage révèle comment divers fonctionnaires internationaux, diplomates et experts ont formulé, diffusé, matérialisé ou encore contesté la gestion migratoire. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille Mialot 217 … [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
In short, a statute’ [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court took a significant step in Murray v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
In short supporting affidavits, each proposed intervening shareholder wrote: “I have a material interest in this lawsuit”; “I could be adversely affected by any judgment made in this lawsuit”; “I cannot afford an attorney”; and “I adopt the complaint as my complaint in this action. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:20 am
Elien Verniers, Strasbourg Observers: Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:57 pm
Hearst v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
Schwartz v Oshman & Mirisola, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31592(U) May 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155780/2023 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
The standard of the experiments also fell short of what would have been required for a peer-reviewed publication. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:15 am
See Steinberg v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
" Petrella v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
App. 630 (2022), the short-form indictment was insufficient. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
The sex, in her consistent telling, was bad, short, but not criminal. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am
I was thinking about that, and the fact that not every horse could have taken Mystik Dan’s remarkable inside run to a win in the Kentucky Derby, while still musing on the summary judgment ruling in Sellers v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
The case at issue is last year’s C P Aquaculture (India) Pvt Ltd v Aqua Star Pty Ltd [2023] VCC 2134. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
