Search for: "Slough v. Slough"
Results 81 - 100
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 9:12 am
Critics of the Supreme Court’s recent Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:48 am
Josh Blackman, who has been on the Supreme Court’s abortion protest buffer zone speech restriction case, McCullen v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:08 pm
Kirby v Daily Telegraph, 13 August 1998, Roch, Ward and Potter LJJ, held that a previous judgment in a libel case was final and could not be reopened. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] DeBord v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 6 December 2010, Mr Justice Tugendhat will hear an application in the case of Etherington v Associated Newspapers Ltd [Update 2] On Thursday 9 December 2010, the Court of Appeal will hand down judgment in the case of Clift v Slough BC (on appeal from [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)) Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward,… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
In the Courts On 23 and 24 June 2010, the Court of Appeal (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ) heard the defendants’ appeal against the decision of Tugendhat J in Clift v Slough BC ([2009] EWHC 1150 (QB)). [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Congress cannot avoid this responsibility by sloughing off authority to the executive.Again, McGinnis cites no text or history for these ideas. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:19 am
The petition in Slough v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:34 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The top layer of her skin sloughed off, she lost the ability to eat without a feeding tube, and she suffered heart failure, liver failure, and a stroke, underwent brain surgery, and lost most of her lung capacity. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Slough, 641 F.3d 544, 550 (D.C. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:09 pm
Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:04 am
GORE and LAWRENCE v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
The case is called Kallal v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
Under s.21, National Assistance Act 1948 both the House of Lords and the Supreme Court had held that a need for accommodation was not sufficient to engage the duty; the duty to provide accommodation only arose if the need for care and attention, which was a need to be looked after, was for services that were not otherwise available unless residential accommodation was provided: M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 and R (SL) v Westminster CC [2013] UKSC 27. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
But you'll rarely find another oral argument as philosophical than the one just completed in Baze v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
In State v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm
” Following D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR (and BB v France (see N v UK at D68), the case was exceptional because Mr De A was at the end of his life. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Latif v. [read post]
