Search for: "Smith v. Department of Human Resources" Results 81 - 100 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Natural Resources Defense Council? [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
However, the clinic did not have the equipment or resources necessary to perform the procedure. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Alito concluded his opinion: “In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Guest Contributor
The National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) has been coordinating, in concert with the FDA, the On-Farm Readiness Review (OFRR) program2. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 22, March 29, April 12, April 18, April 26, May 9, May 16 and May 23 conferences)   Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 15 May 2019 the Joint Committee on Human Rights held an evidence session in its inquiry “Democracy, free speech and freedom of association”. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
Last up is Shabo v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Smith: should libraries educate about copyright? [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
In fact, it has even broader implications than Masterpiece because in addition to the question that launched 95 amicus briefs in that case – whether bakers can be required to engage their expressive efforts in a manner contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs – the Kleins ask the court to overrule its seminal 1990 decision in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Resources for those affected by sextortion are linked below. [read post]