Search for: "Smith v. Gordon" Results 81 - 100 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  BACKGROUND   Last week the SEC issued a settled administrative order finding that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (now rebranded as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management) failed to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Tillinger Next up is Tillinger v Gordon, Short Form Order, Index No. 603463/14 [Sup Ct Nassau County Mar. 23, 2016], an action brought by the sons/executors of a deceased 25% partner in a general partnership formed with two others in 1980 for the purpose of managing and renting an apartment complex then-owned by the decedent and his brother who also was a 25% partner in the management company. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gordon assumes normative logic comes from incentives. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The Law Society Gazette has a piece entitled “ECHR not binding over legal costs appeal, rules judge” commenting on the recent decision of Master Gordon-Saker in the case of BNM  v Mirror Group ([2016] EWHC B1 (Costs)). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
On 11 January 2016 Master Gordon-Saker handed down judgment in the case of BNM v Mirror Group [2016] EWHC B1 (Costs). [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Even in the legis. history, Congress discusses White-Smith v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Gordon Smith in his August 6, 2015 post on the CLS Blue Sky Blog (here) calls “the Modern Business Judgment Rule. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:26 am
Rasabout; Professor Gordon Smith (The Conglomerate) has a detailed post on the subject, which is much worth reading. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
” Ingrid Wuerth linked us to her new commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]