Search for: "Smith v. Sam"
Results 81 - 100
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
But such tariffs did not require the passenger to buy a Canada-wide all year pass for $3,000 if they only needed to travel to Toronto or Montreal or Smith’s Falls a few times each year. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 688 F.3d 1342, 1366 (Fed. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am
As Wikipedia explains, and as I’ve noted in other posts, hearsay is essentially second-hand evidence, i.e., it consists of Jane Doe’s testifying that Sam Smith told her X about the defendant. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
Overstock.com Q4 2008 violated GAAP by failing to restate prior financial reports to correct a material accounting error and instead recognized a one-time gain to show its first profit in 15 quarters (Details here).Lee Webb from Stockwatch chronicled my year long battle with Overstock.com to successfully force the company to comply with SEC Regulation G for certain non-GAAP financial disclosures and my ongoing battle to force the company to comply with GAAP and SEC rules in reporting accounting… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Rev. 1727-1817 (2010).Smith, Craig. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:11 pm
The court noted that Washington's Motion to Kiss My Ass was an expression of frustration leveled at Magistrate Judge Smith for refusing to allow him to add as parties to the case one Judge Karpf and one Senator Sam Nunn. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
The default rule excluding hearsay is, as I again noted in that post, based on simple fairness: If hearsay weren't excluded, Jane Doe could take the stand at Sam Smith's trial for murder and tell the jury that Stan Ford had told her (Jane) that Sam committed the murder Sam's on trial for. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
(Hat tip: HobbySpace)Space race v. auctioning: Sam "big advocate of space property rights" Dinkin replies to Prof. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
Studies show that women get interrupted more (no matter how senior), passed over for promotions and raises (even though entitled) and reviewed negatively for similar traits celebrated and promoted in men (bossy v leadership, arrogant v confident, etc). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:57 am
-Sam M. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am
: Firehouse Restaurant Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
The Press Gazette reports that Lady Justice Smith granted the applicant permission to appeal. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Justice Smith, writing for the majority, in Sam v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
Briefly: For this blog, Sam Wieczorek previews Christopher v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 12:01 am
In 1944, the NAACP triumphed in Smith v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
On 15 July 2016, Green J handed down judgment in the case of Smith v Unknown Defendant [2016] EWHC 1775 (QB). [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
