Search for: "Spikes v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2022, 2:58 am
ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C. has filed a figurative application for an image of the Empire State Building (see below) covering, among other things “non-fungible tokens (NFTs)” and “downloadable multimedia files containing artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)” in Class 9 (see here).The sheer number of ‘Metaverse-related’ filings already present on the register indicates that brands are determined to secure their protection… [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:45 pm
Here is the abstract: Hate crimes and racially motivated violence spiked in the United States over the past few years. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:30 am
Perhaps back in 2020, or when Delta/Omicron spiked, but now?!? [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for… [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:56 am
Hill v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:47 am
With respect to the latter point, one need only look back at a 2018 decision (San Francisco Police Officers’ Assn. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 7:27 am
This trend is illustrated by the spike in filings asserting violations of the California Private Attorneys’ General Act (“PAGA”), which claims, according to current California precedent, are not subject to arbitration based on Iskanian v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:27 am
“ On November 30, 2021, in State of Louisiana v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 7:17 am
” EPLic stated: “The encyclopedic . . . [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm
(Please note that these figures reflect only federal court securities class action lawsuit filings; the filing numbers do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings during the year.) [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:05 am
Watkins Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 11:26 am
Matthew Tokson analyzed federal and state judgments applying Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
Examination Board of Professional Home Inspectors v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:50 am
21, 2021, in the case of Santo’s Italian Café, LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
In Alabama Association of Realtors v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
It means that a service that has a traffic spike due to a viral hit or a seasonal high would need to incur all of the compliance costs even if it never again reaches that threshold. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:35 am
In fact, since the 1905 Supreme Court case Jacobson v. [read post]
