Search for: "State ex rel. State v. Lewis" Results 81 - 98 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Paul Stern
If compensating injured parties was the sole purpose of constitutional tort law, the rationale would best be effectuated through a remedial regime akin to what Justice Lewis Powell referred to as strict liability in Owens v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:49 pm
Industrial Commission Rejects Affidavit Testimony Posted on February 6, 2008 by Patrick Lewis The Ohio Supreme Court recently decided State ex rel. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:49 pm
Industrial Commission Rejects Affidavit Testimony Posted on February 6, 2008 by Patrick Lewis The Ohio Supreme Court recently decided State ex rel. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Just under three years ago, Benjamin Wittes, Cody Poplin, Clara Spera and Quinta Jurecic published a Brookings Institution report on sextortion—a relatively new form of cybercrime in which a perpetrator extorts victims by threatening to disseminate sexually explicit content involving the victim, usually obtained through hacking, online manipulation or trickery. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(EPLAW) District Court of The Hague: Ex parte order based on misleading information: Franz Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co, KG v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]