Search for: "State of Delaware v. Sells." Results 81 - 100 of 753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
A shareholder’s ability to dispose of his stock is merely defined by the terms of the corporate contract, which in turn is provided by the firm’s organic documents and the state of incorporation’s corporate statute and common law. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 12:46 am
However, the Delaware Supreme Court decided against the preferred stock having a class vote pursuant to Section 2115 in a case called Examen, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:32 am by Raymond McKenzie
In Vidal, a franchisee located in Washington State brought an action against a franchisor that was incorporated in Delaware and maintained its principal place of business in New York. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Paul Pryzant and Matthew Simmons
The parties In a very recent opinion on October 6, 2022, by the Delaware Chancery Court, Kodiak Building Partners, LLC v Adams, Vice Chancellor Zurn ruled that the restrictive covenants imposed on a stockholder in an acquisition were overbroad and unenforceable. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:02 am by Steve Bainbridge
Steele, the court disagreed with the Delaware Chancery Court's interpretation of Brophy v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am by Peter Mahler
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]