Search for: "State of North Carolina v. EPA"
Results 81 - 100
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
EPA also filed a petition, as did a coalition of 15 states and cities (North Carolina, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Baltimore, Bridgeport, Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C.). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
EPA also filed a petition, as did a coalition of 15 states and cities (North Carolina, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Baltimore, Bridgeport, Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C.). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Cir. 2000) and North Carolina v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Cir. 2000) and North Carolina v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
However, in North Carolina v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:43 am
Notably, this issue was addressed in North Carolina v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:43 am
Notably, this issue was addressed in North Carolina v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:18 am
EPA will also know Georgia v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Keating, in which North Carolina's Business Court dismissed a claim because the alleged trade secrets — customer lists, customer contract information, pricing information and product information – were pled too generally to state a claim for misappropriation. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
Circuit Court’s order, in North Carolina v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals recently issued an interesting decision in Wang v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:17 am
And the other signatories to the brief (Alaska, Wyoming, South Carolina, Virginia, North Dakota, Nebraska, Arizona, Colorado, and Michigan) are not the reliably-blue-state crowd that Hawaii usually hangs out with on legal issues. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Last week, the petitioners filed their merits brief in Sackett v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
North Carolina, 10-8800 (relisted once), presented an ex post facto challenge to a North Carolina sex offender monitoring law. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:33 am
First, in North Carolina v. [read post]
