Search for: "State v. Arden"
Results 81 - 100
of 231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:22 am
The House of Lords considered the effect of s 17(1) in Din (Taj) v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657, HL. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am
They carefully considered the historical context of the decision in Wilkinson v Downton. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Clayton Arden v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
A familiar sight for lawyersinvolved in TVCatchup suitsITV Broadcasting Limited, ITV 2 Limited, ITV Digital Channels Limited, Channel Four Television Corporation, 4 Ventures Limited, Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited and ITV Studios Limited v TVCatchup Limited (in administration), TVCatchup (UK) Limited and Media Resources Limited (a Mauritian company) [2015] EWCA Civ 204 is the latest development in the long-running copyright litigation saga which is usually known by its shorter name of ITV… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
The Court of Appeal similarly accepted the evidence noting that there had been no application to challenge the evidence of the Secretary of State: see [2013] EWCA Civ 199 at [70] (per Arden LJ). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:18 pm
And that must be how the Court felt in Sanneh v SSWP and others [2015] EWCA Civ 49, which concerns the eligibility rules for Zambrano carers of a raft of social assistance benefits. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
On Friday the Court of Appeal (Lady Justice Arden and Lords Justices Floyd and Bean) allowed the appeal, Floyd LJ delivering a single judgment with which the others concurred. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:38 am
For this reason, Mr Anson had paid federal and state tax in the US on his share of HV’s profits. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am
In dismissing the application, Lady Justice Arden stated that the Prince had “failed to comply with an order of the court and there is no reason why he should be relieved of the consequences”. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am
Lady Justice Arden gave the lead judgment, with which there was unanimous judicial consent. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am
On August 4, 2010 the Eighth Circuit ruled in Johnson v. [read post]
