Search for: "State v. Baxter"
Results 81 - 100
of 440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2006, 11:18 am
Baxter v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
The Court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:34 pm
The purpose of that concurring opinion is to express disagreement with the Ninth Circuit’s “mistaken belief”—stated most recently in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 3:47 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
Baxter v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:25 pm
” Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
(See United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
You get more 5-4 decisions in the United States Supreme Court than 4-3 decisions in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Petitioner stated that, going back to Weaver v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:45 pm
This is what our office demonstrated in Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:35 am
The opinion, written by Justice Baxter, notes the "use, possession, cultivation, transportation, and furnishing of marijuana" are generally prohibited by both state and federal laws. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sarkar v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 289 (19 March 2010) Maroudas v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280 (18 March 2010) Connor v Surrey County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 286 (18 March 2010) William Hare Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 283 (18 March 2010) Bloomsbury International Ltd & Ors. v The Sea Fish Industry Authority… [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:08 pm
In 2001 Baxter filed an ANDA to market generic sevoflurane. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of State Farm Mut. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
This would be to under-state their involvement. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:27 am
Chang v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 6:27 pm
Friends of Motherhouse v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
In a case in which there is some doubt about the claimant’s title to the patent itself, the suggestion is that title has to be perfected by the judgment of the court – for example, ensuring that the legal owner must be joined to the proceedings (see Baxter v NPB [1998] RPC 250). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:46 pm
Bradley v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Medtronic v. [read post]
