Search for: "State v. Bear King" Results 81 - 100 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2022, 12:05 pm by Lane Law Firm, P.A.
During his career, he played for the New York Knicks, Houston Rockets, Sacramento Kings, Golden State Warriors and the Miami Heat. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:51 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
   The tribunal rejected the worker’s argument that the decision of the ECJ in King v Sash Window Workshop [2018] ICR 693 (“King”) entitled him to bring, on the termination of his engagement, a claim in respect of all unpaid annual leave accrued throughout his engagement with the respondent, both taken and untaken, which would become payable on termination. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I also understand that a judge's intent is not relevant to whether the judge's actions violated the Code, though it should have a bearing on what the judge's sanction is. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
First, Adams' understanding of the right to bear arms is fundamentally incompatible with New York's assertions in NYSRPA v. [read post]