Search for: "State v. City Betterment Corp." Results 81 - 100 of 465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Richard Hunt
This isn’t a surprising result since it is precisely the result reached by the Supreme Court in Havens Development Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins and David Hudson
City of Chicago, the issue was whether the court should reconsider Hill in light of its intervening decisions in McCullen and Reed v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
To the extent an employer intends to make employees whole for prior compensation reductions as financial conditions improve, from a Section 409A compliance perspective, it would be better to do so on a discretionary basis in the form of a bonus or other compensation. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:10 pm by Paul R. Verkuil
No case better illustrates the Court’s contrasting approaches to the arbitral and administrative regimes than Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm by Patent Litigation Group
[xxii]  As a result of the United States’ entry into World War II in December of 1941, the seller was unable to obtain an export permit for shipment into the United States and had been previously delayed due to repairs and war conditions. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006) (cited favorably by State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]