Search for: "State v. Coughlin"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Siegel, Before (and after) Roe V. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:34 am
US v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am
(see CPLR 217[1]; see also Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834 [1983]). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:49 am
McIntosh v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Identification of the records demanded.Noting that Kirsch and Starvaggi had "reasonably described" the requested emails thus enabling the Board to identify and produce the records, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, held that the Board "cannot evade the broad disclosure provisions of [the] statute . . . upon the naked allegation that the request will require review of thousands of records. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
This was demonstrated in the Appellate Division’s ruling in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, a case involving a tenured State employee, the Court of Appeals said the employer could threaten the employee with disciplinary action if he or she did not resign. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 1:24 pm
The settlement in Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:20 pm
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
” Coughlin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 2:50 am
Chiara v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 am
The case involves a defense objection under Batson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:48 am
Coughlin. 76 F.3d 468, 477 (2d Cir. 1996). [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:54 pm
Additional Resources: Coughlin v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as an excessively lengthy or intense questioning, courts will not deem the individual's resignation to have been obtained under duress.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeal addressed a situation where an employee was offered the option of resigning from his position or having formal disciplinary charges filed against him. [read post]
