Search for: "State v. Crown" Results 81 - 100 of 1,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am by Michael Oykhman
To establish this mental state, the Crown must demonstrate that the accused possessed awareness that the material in question predominantly focused on the exploitation of sex. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am by centerforartlaw
The crowning moment came in 1873 when the city decided to move Michelangelo’s David from the Piazza Della Signoria to the Gallerie dell’Academia to better preserve the work.[4] With this transfer, the Gallerie acquired the image rights to David, rights which did not exist at the time of the work’s creation in 1504. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The sale of offices-as-property may seem strange and even corrupt to modern readers, but it was a long-lasting and practical foundation for the nation-state, modern administration, and colonial expansion.Whereas vénalité had grown out of control in revolutionary-era France, the English had a more stable system of freehold property rights, a distinctive English protection of the officeholders’ investment against “despotic” displacement. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:55 am by JURIST Staff
The Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Habib Ullah Energy Limited and another v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A [*2]motion to compel responses to demands and interrogatories is properly denied where the demands and interrogatories seek information which is irrelevant, overly broad, or burdensome” (Bennett v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]