Search for: "State v. Cutler" Results 81 - 100 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2007, 10:04 pm
Following law school, Neil clerked for Judge Paul V. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:09 pm
Following law school, Neil clerked for Judge Paul V. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:30 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:22 pm
In 1972, in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
Yesterday, the Constitution Project held a day-long symposium, "Strickland v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Indeed, I assigned materials across the ideological spectrum, including the so-called "Texas Plan" put forth by Texas Governor Greg Abbott that advocates nine important structural changes--one of them similar to that advocated by Georgetown Law Professor Randy Barnett that would allow state legislatures to nullify federal legislation--and Lloyd Cutler's article from 1980, "To Form A Government," that advocated a number of changes to strengthen what… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:42 pm
Texas, the 2003 case that overturned state sodomy laws, but perhaps they'll submit a question in writingMore on Roper v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Chris
While at WilmerHale he was the lead counsel representing the University of Michigan and its then president Lee Bollinger before the United States Supreme Court in the famous Gratz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm by Florian Mueller
Thales, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case no. 21-2106: October 21, 2021 "Brief for Amicus Curiae ACT | The App Association in Support of Appellant" submitted by one of Apple's go-to firms, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (a firm I've often had extremely positive things to say, but it should be beneath WilmerHale to represent astroturfers)Continental v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 6:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
From today's decision partly granting a temporary restraining order in Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP v. [read post]