Search for: "State v. E. B." Results 81 - 100 of 9,992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Filipczak v Filipczak, 2013 WL 692694 (2d Cir 2013) [Poland] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Well Settled]
2 May 2013, 10:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Burgos v. [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
CAFC rules on vacuum toilets used in airplanes; a coin is a tool
23 Mar 2016, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” ShamrockTechs., Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Predictions for United States v. Rodriguez
8 May 2008, 1:55 pm
§924(e)(2)(B). [read post]
Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com
DeWine v. DeWine (with the United States somewhere in between)
8 Apr 2014, 7:30 am by Marty Lederman
Anthony List v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Supreme Court Holds that a Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment Under Civil Rule 59(e) Is Not a Second or Successive Habeas Petition.
2 Jun 2020, 7:40 am by Edward S. Zas
In Bannister v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
School district directed to resume reimbursing its retirees' Medicare Part B surcharges
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
School district directed to resume reimbursing its retirees' Medicare Part B surcharges
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Recording Available for “What to Expect in Chemicals Policy and Regulation and on Capitol Hill in 2024” Webinar
25 Jan 2024, 12:03 pm by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
Bergeson, Managing Partner, B&C; James V. [read post]
Nano and Other Emerging Chemical Technologies Blog - http://nanotech.lawbc.com/
Recording Available for “What to Expect in Chemicals Policy and Regulation and on Capitol Hill in 2024” Webinar
25 Jan 2024, 12:03 pm by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
Bergeson, Managing Partner, B&C; James V. [read post]
Pesticide Law and Policy Blog - http://pesticideblog.lawbc.com/
Argument Preview: United States v. King, No. 11-0583/NA
9 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm by Zachary Spilman
United States v. [read post]
CAAFlog - http://caaflog.blogspot.com/
Myriad Moves to Dismiss Ambry's Antitrust Counterclaims on Noerr-Pennington Doctrine
28 Aug 2013, 8:57 pm by Patent Docs
Pro. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a legally cognizable claim. [read post]
Patent Docs - http://www.patentdocs.org/
Monzon v De La Roca, 2018 WL 6424956 (3d Cir, 2018)[Guatemala] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Commencement of proceeding] [Defenses]
8 Dec 2018, 5:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
”); Miller v. [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
Commentary: On Reconsideration: What’s Up With State v. Aalim?
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am by MBettman
One of those was State v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
State of Arizona v. ASARCO (9th Cir. - Oct. 24, 2013)
24 Oct 2013, 3:57 pm
(E)  Reduce punitives to $2,500. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
State v. Fleming:  Race, Miranda and Trafficking in Prison Contraband.
29 Oct 2020, 4:56 pm by Ed Folsom, Maine Criminal Defense Attorney
State v. [read post]
Edmund R. Folsom Law Blog - http://edfolsomlaw.com/the-law-blog
The Second Circuit vacates and remands for resentencing because of the erroneous application of the Sentencing Guidelines enhancements for possessing a “dangerous weapon” (§ 2B3.1, cmt. n.2) and “physical restraint” (§ 2B3.1(b)(4)(B)) – – which increase the offense level for robbery offenses. United States v. Taylor, No. 18-1710,  __F.3d__, 2020 WL 2745536  (May 27,  2020). 
3 Jun 2020, 11:57 am by Darrell Fields
In United States v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
Oral Argument Preview: Unsealing a Judicial Record of Acquittal? State of Ohio v. Terrell Vanzandt
23 May 2014, 6:48 am by MBettman
Weber and State v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
State Bears the Burden of Persuasion At Bail Source Hearing
5 May 2009, 5:58 pm
In State v. [read post]
The Jersey Lawyer - http://yournjlawyer.com
Aggravating factors need not outweigh mitigating factors beyond reasonable doubt to impose death penalty
1 Aug 2007, 5:16 am
§ 848(e)(1)(B), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
Direct Appeal - http://directappeal2.blogspot.com/
Delaware federal district court holds use of overdraft notice template did not shield credit union from Regulation E or state law liability
26 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by John L. Culhane, Jr. and Michael R. Guerrero
In Miller v. [read post]
CFPB Monitor - http://www.cfpbmonitor.com