Search for: "State v. Harms" Results 81 - 100 of 23,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2012, 8:04 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Railroad Friction Products Corp. that the federal Locomotive Inspection Act preempted the petitioner's state-law design-defect and failure-to-warn claims arising out of harms from exposure to asbestos. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:16 am by Eileen McDermott
Perhaps most notably, in a stated effort to better protect consumers by minimizing confusion about goods and services, the bill would restore the rebuttable presumption of irreparable harm when a trademark violation has been proven (thus clarifying eBay v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Richard Montes
For Constitutional Law buffs, on Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Snyder v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:42 am by Cyberleagle
There was still no attempt to define or limit the concept of harm. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:08 am by michael
Regina (Oakes) v Secretary of State for Justice and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1169; [2010] WLR(D) 267 “The different wording of the tests to be applied when considering the suitability for automatic release of a prisoner who had been recalled to prison for breaching the terms of his licence, under ss 255A(5) and 255C(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (as inserted by section 29(2) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008) was deliberate. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by Cyberleagle
” [1.23] If a Secretary of State decides that he wants to silence anti-vaxxers, the right way to go about it is to present a Bill to Parliament, have it debated and, if Parliament agrees, pass it into law. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Stevan Porter
One of the factors considers the presence of irreparable injury, which is harm not quantifiable or remediable as money damages. [read post]