Search for: "State v. Kenneth A. James" Results 81 - 100 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:37 am by Joshua Matz
Briefly: Adam Winkler provides a history of gun rights at The Atlantic, concluding that Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:13 pm by Mike
There is some debate as to the standard of proof required in such a case as Judge James Ware explains: SEC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:46 pm by David Bernstein
My confidence in the book did not increase when I saw that MacLean tied the rise of the early libertarian movement to hostility to Brown v. [read post]