Search for: "State v. Kirkland"
Results 81 - 100
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2009, 10:29 am
In March, the high court struck down pre-emption involving drugs in a major case, Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
“Sundholm v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 4:05 am
In Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP in Los Angeles will argue for the petitioners. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
It need not be followed, for example, when an agency's action is challenged as either unconstitutional or wholly beyond its grant of power, or when resort to an administrative remedy would be futile or when its pursuit would cause irreparable injury" citing see Town of Oyster Bay v Kirkland, 81 AD3d 812. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
It need not be followed, for example, when an agency's action is challenged as either unconstitutional or wholly beyond its grant of power, or when resort to an administrative remedy would be futile or when its pursuit would cause irreparable injury" citing see Town of Oyster Bay v Kirkland, 81 AD3d 812. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
Kirkland and Ellis, LLP, 954 N.E.2d 803 (Ill.App. 2011). [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:23 am
Kirkland & Ellis Stephen Byrne v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, a challenge to the use of a state burglary conviction as a basis for enhancing a sentence for a federal crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:55 pm
The United States opposed the judges’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:40 am
The case is Madison v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Michael Kirkland of UPI describes the facts in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am
Prof That same panel is hearing two other IP cases: Samsung v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am
UPI’s Michael Kirkland summarizes the issues underlying Arizona v. [read post]
