Search for: "State v. Kong" Results 81 - 100 of 864
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm by Giorgio Luceri
This is the case with Standard International Management LLC (in the following "Standard Hotels"), an American group with seven boutique hotels in New York City (Meatpacking District and East Village), Miami Beach, London, the Maldives, Ibiza and Hua Hin in Thailand, and the Hong Kong-based Asia Standard Management Services Ltd (in the following "Asia Standard"), whose main premium assets are located in the Hong Kong CBDs. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
FEC, Disclosure, Political spending, State law, Taxation SEC Bulletin on Conflicts of Interest for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by W. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Emma Snell
In the 2013 report from the Justice Department inspector general, investigators said they did “not believe” Joseph V. [read post]
Case date: 20 April 2022 Case number: No. 18-916 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
., vacated its prior decision, and reversed the district court’s judgment that the claims of patent at issue were not invalid (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. v. [read post]