Search for: "State v. P. S." Results 81 - 100 of 20,852
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been… [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Harper Haunts State and Federal Constitutional Interpretation of … Continue reading The post A Justice’s Perspective on Moore v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 12:11 pm
ref=broadbandbreakfast.com at p. 4. [read post]
14 May 2024, 12:11 pm
ref=broadbandbreakfast.com at p. 4. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Salamone v Deily & Glastetter, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31569(U) May 3, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160104/2022Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]