Search for: "State v. State Board of Finance" Results 81 - 100 of 1,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2007, 1:15 pm
The Court also found that the individual school board members also lacked standing to bring the suit under State Finance Law § 123-b . [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Colorado is unique in being the only state to effectively outsource enforcement of its campaign finance regulations by allowing ‘any person who believes’ that campaign finance laws are being violated” to initiate litigation by filing a complaint. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
EEO/iNews from State CourtsiNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Emily Chan
 For more on the distinction between a governing board and other roles, please read our post  “Advisory Board v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:41 am by Frank Cranmer
In Professor Doreen McCalla v Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance Inc & Anor [2021] UKET 1303655/2021, the claimant felt a call to ordination in the Church of England and went through its Discernment of Vocations Process between February 2016 and June 2021 but was rejected for training. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Sharp & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1474 (21 December 2010) Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 December 2010) Francis, R (on the application of) v West Midlands Probation Board [2010] EWCA Civ 1470 (21 December 2010) Safeway Stores Ltd & Ors v Twigger & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1472 (21 December… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had, in a previous post, commented on the observations of the Supreme Court in Booz Allen & Hamilton v SBI Home Finance as regards the power of the Chief Justice to determine questions pertaining to Arbitrability in an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had, in a previous post, commented on the observations of the Supreme Court in Booz Allen & Hamilton v SBI Home Finance as regards the power of the Chief Justice to determine questions pertaining to Arbitrability in an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Chamber paper, and more on trends in Australia] “Congress Can’t Create an Independent and Unaccountable New Branch of Government” [Ilya Shapiro on Cato cert amicus in State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
State and local officials took a variety of elaborate steps to block the sale, making it impossible for the purchaser to obtain financing for the property. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:56 pm by Jason Greis
Responsibility for care also is a common law duty, as courts since Darling v. [read post]