Search for: "State v. T. Payne" Results 81 - 100 of 187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
Rather, “[t]he Fourth Amendment only requires that the subsequent search of the computer be made within a reasonable time” (United States v Mutschelknaus, 564 F Supp 2d 1072, 1076, affd 592 F3d 826). [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Helmerich & Payne International, a case involving pleading standards for expropriation cases against foreign governments filed in U.S. courts, and SCA Hygiene Products v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:44 am
California and, with Justice Souter joining, Zamudio v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:10 am by Scott Bomboy
The second income tax law was soon overturned by the Supreme Court in the 1895 decision of Pollack v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  Quite the contrary, Third Restatement’s drafters criticized comment j’s presumption language as “unfortunate” and stated that it shouldn’t be followed. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:44 pm
  That is why the district court was correct and the Sixth Circuit is wrong in Payne v. [read post]