Search for: "Strong v. Georgia"
Results 81 - 100
of 711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2010, 3:45 pm
Ruiz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 5:55 am
”, forthcoming in the Georgia State University Law Review, on SSRN. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:55 pm
There is a strong presumption in favor of the lodestar amount, but it may be adjusted based on the twelve factors set out in Johnson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
As Sam Kamin notes over at Co-Op, today the SCT is hearing arguments in Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am
David, a qualified economist with experience in the field, followed the traditional application of the Georgia-Pacific factors, see Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
Hall v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 12:00 am
In this judgment Colonial Pipeline Company v AIG Specialty Insurance Company, 1:19 –cv-762-MLB (US District Court Georgia, the policy included a US$10 million self-insured retention. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm
When parties to a FLSA case filed in a federal court in Georgia, Florida, or Alabama seek to settle, they must comply with what the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in the 1982 case of Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 2:55 am
Technical College System of Georgia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
And, of course, differences can be exaggerated the farther down the rankings one goes, a reason I also confined this to the “top 50” for now.)POTENTIAL WINNERS, PEER CHANGEGeorge Mason (65 v. 30)BYU (52 v. 23)Alabama (36 v. 25)Florida (31 v. 21)Utah (47 v. 37)Wake Forest (47 v. 37)Texas A&M (56 v. 46)Georgia (36 v. 29)How about the other side? [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
And, of course, differences can be exaggerated the farther down the rankings one goes, a reason I also confined this to the “top 50” for now.)POTENTIAL WINNERS, PEER CHANGEGeorge Mason (65 v. 30)BYU (52 v. 23)Alabama (36 v. 25)Florida (31 v. 21)Utah (47 v. 37)Wake Forest (47 v. 37)Texas A&M (56 v. 46)Georgia (36 v. 29)How about the other side? [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:26 pm
--Court: Supreme Court of TexasOpinion Date: 6/24/11Cite: Marsh USA Inc v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:43 am
In a recent personal injury car accident lawsuit, Anni Curtice v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
The case is Latimer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:16 am
Courts use that standard to determine whether an affidavit justifies a search or seizure because there is probable cause to believe that the subject committed a crime.In Illinois v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
To reach this finding, the court applied the interpretation of § 51-1-11(c) found in the 2016 decision of Chrysler Grp., LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The post <strong>The Impact of Banning Gender-Affirming Care on Employees</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
