Search for: "Sullivan v Mains" Results 81 - 100 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am by Priscilla Smith
The main message we hear is that Planned Parenthood is great health care, vital for many women in the country. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ginsburg borrowed from her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Another preview comes from Kara Goad and Elizabeth Sullivan at Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am by Ron Coleman
You won’t find “bridging the gap” as a factor listed in Seventh Circuit cases such as Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
Heller — the main case about the right to bear arms. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
  For that reason, since February 2014, almost every case that the Court has granted has been relisted at least once, with the main exception being cases granted out of the late-September “Long Conference” (presumably because during the summer, the Court has enough extra time that the relist isn’t necessary). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:54 am by Ngai Zhang
In an effort to obtain evidence to attack the credibility of the prosecutors’ main witness, Sullivan’s ex-girlfriend, defense attorneys subpoenaed Facebook, Instagram and Twitter for her posts and activity logs, which they claimed would show that jealousy was the motivating factor for testifying against Sullivan. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v Village of Bloomingburg, 2015 WL 3604300 (SDNY 6/9/2015) The opinion and order can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202729033706/Bloomingburg-Jewish-Education-Center-et-al-Plaintiffs-v-Village-of-Bloomingburg-New-York-et-al-Defendants-14cv7250-KBF Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, RLUIPA Tagged: hasidism and zoning, mikva and zoning, zoning discrimination [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:01 am
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove "actual malice" to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:01 am by Lee E. Berlik
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove “actual malice” to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am by Clara Spera
On Friday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), after four years of litigation, shifted its strategy in its banner NSA case, Jewel v. [read post]