Search for: "Sullivan v. Superior Court" Results 81 - 100 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
July 19, 2019), the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas did not commit any error in a products liability case when it instructed the jury on both the consumer expectation test and the risk-utility test that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court established in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
An entity making an administrative decision should not be permitted to create or rely upon reasons for its denial not stated at the time of the denial should the decision be challenged White v County of Sullivan, 2012 NY Slip Op 09131, Appellate Division, Third Department Supreme Court granted Earl White’s CPLR Article 78 to partially vacate Sullivan County’s determination denying White benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 11:55 am by Andrew Delaney
While SCOV doesn’t put a label on the dismissal here, it notes that the dismissal is not a subject-matter-jurisdiction dismissal because it doesn’t extinguish the superior court’s power to hear the case. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As U.S. financial institutions assess their ESG risks, opportunities, policies and procedures for 2023, key considerations include the numerous significant ESG developments in 2022—in particular, recent proposals and initiatives announced by financial regulators with respect to climate-related risk management and disclosures—and overarching regulatory, political, investor and litigation trends. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
After the hearing, the Superior Court of Muscogee County issued a broad permanent protective order …. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
Accordingly, we remand to the Sullivan Superior Court with instructions to transfer this matter to the Howard Superior Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:47 am
Sullivan, J., would deny transfer, believing the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case to be correct. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm by Schachtman
Bottom line: these verdicts are unsafe. [1]  The cases were tried in a questionable consolidation in the New Jersey Superior Court, for Middlesex County, before Judge Viscomi. [read post]