Search for: "TEAGUE v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 9:22 pm
The state’s highest court turned him down again, having decided in earlier cases that it would apply the Teague v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
In a recent article, Perry Moriearty argued that Miller was a substantive change to the law and thus qualifies for one of Teague v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:27 am
Griffith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:27 am
Griffith v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Intricate discussions of retroactivity doctrine and federalism, habeas corpus, and finality, have proven attractive to some of the Justices in the past in cases such as Teague v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm
On the retroactivity question, the Justices will be dealing with the continuing legal fall-out of a decision they issued in 1989, Teague v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
§2254(d) if the California Supreme Court is deemed to have ruled on the question and under the rule of Teague v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm
This year, professor Halderman and Vanessa Teague of the University of Melbourne discovered a cryptographic flaw in a New South Wales' e-voting system that may have left as many as 66,000 votes vulnerable to surveillance and tampering in that states' most recent election. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:31 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
Some academics and defense lawyers tried to claim that the new limit was either a codification of Teague v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
P. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
In Teague v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
On cert., the state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
These cases were on collateral attack in state court, and a majority of the Justices filed separate opinions explaining why each declined to invalidate the death sentences in those cases (in some opinions relying upon non-retroactivity per Teague v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
But Davis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Joining the state’s petitions for that Conference is Reginald’s own petition in Carr v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:32 am
It adopted the anti-retroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
