Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
The question came to the Court through Barr v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:32 pm
She used that same phrase in Collins v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 2:33 am
US v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Ninth Circuit observed, “every major medical, psychiatric, psychological, and professional mental health organization opposes the use of conversion therapy. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:10 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:34 pm
Thomas's conduct was motivated by her desire to obtain the copyrighted music for her own use. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
Klein’s information, but we had to keep the actual evidence under seal for a long time, making it easy for the government to largely ignore us and, when pushed, dismiss Mark’s claims as unfounded since he was just a lowly technician.1 We tried another part of the “Ellsberg” strategy. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:30 pm
Justice Thomas's claim puts the notion of "unusual" in a new and useful light. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:04 pm
The Court thus shut the door on the theory advanced by the government in support of a retrial, rejecting its arguments that either Richardson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, the Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm
SEC (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring); see also United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Polansky v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Polansky v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The ruling, by a vote of 7-2, was written by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
28 May 2022, 7:51 am
In related news, Ginny Thomas was working for Heritage in 2000 trying to get folks placed in the upcoming Bush Administration while Justice Thomas was deciding the election for Bush in Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm
In those cases, we held that a unit of government may not condition the approval of a land-use permit on the owner's relinquishment of a portion of his property unless there is a 'nexus' and 'rough proportionality' between the government's demand and the effects of the proposed land use. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:06 pm
On February 25, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Yates v. [read post]
