Search for: "Tate v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State and Santa Clara County both filed their return briefs on September 9, 2011. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State and Santa Clara County both filed their return briefs on September 9, 2011. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:02 pm
Hunter v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 9:30 pm
The National Historical Publications and Records Commission awarded the University of Cincinnati's Archives and Rare Books Library a grant to complete the processing of the records of the Cincinnati Branch of the NAACP related to the Bronson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:16 am
Clark is the 50th President of the State Bar of Georgia and a Past President of Georgia Trial Lawyers Association and has practiced law in Georgia for 26 years. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:54 am
E.P.A. and Sierra Club v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:40 am
The Court in State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Cupek v. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am
” Light v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Settling a disciplinary action by agreeing to disciplinary probationMatter of Campbell v State of New York, 37 AD3d 993The New York State Office of Mental Health [OMH] filed disciplinary charges against Monica A. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:41 am
NFP criminal opinions today (8): Jesse Tate v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:36 pm
Judge Areces takes the first hit in our 3rd DCA roundup in State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:46 am
”As the Supreme Court held in Nelson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm
In Mengle v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
Article V provides that, "on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states," Congress "shall call a convention for proposing amendments. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:35 am
[State of Tennessee v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
