Search for: "Taylor v. Board of Education"
Results 81 - 100
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2011, 3:27 am
” * The New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] has held that negotiating days off for religious observances was not a mandatory subject of collective bargaining [CSEA v Eastchester UFSD, 29 PERB 3041]. . [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
It will be recalled that for 2011-2013 AC wanted a mandatory FTE tariff to be set by the Copyright Board of (a) $45.00CAD for Universities; or (b) $35.00 CAD for all other Educational Institutions. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
” The leading cases addressing the issue of an individual’s electing a “negotiated disciplinary procedures” rather than an available statutory disciplinary procedure such as that provided by §75 of the Civil Service Law: Antinore v State of New York, 40 NY2d 6 and Abramovich v Board of Education, 46 NY2d 450. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
In Matter of Board of Educ. of the Yonkers City Sch. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
In Matter of Board of Educ. of the Yonkers City Sch. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 4:43 am
”* The court cited Dietz v Board of Educ. of Rochester City School Dist., ___ AD3d ___ [Sept. 28, 2012] and Wiener v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
”Taylor v City of New York 2016 NY Slip Op 03454 Decided on May 3, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:01 am
Suspension without payElmore v Mills, App. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:34 am
And in Davis v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
An illustration of such a narrow construction is set out in Board of Education v Nyquist (48 NY2D 97). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
Within Alphonse v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
