Search for: "Taylor v. Commissioner" Results 81 - 100 of 348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
On November 18, 2020, the Appellate Division, Second Department, handed down four decisions:County of Nassau v Detectives Assn., Inc., of the Police Dept. of Nassau County [DIA], 2020 NY Slip Op 06745;  County of Nassau v Detectives Assn., Inc., of the Police Dept. of Nassau County, 2020 NY Slip Op 06779;County of Nassau v Police Benevolent Assn. of the Police Dept. of the County of Nassau, 2020 NY Slip Op 06780; and County of Nassau v Police Benevolent… [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
On November 18, 2020, the Appellate Division, Second Department, handed down four decisions:County of Nassau v Detectives Assn., Inc., of the Police Dept. of Nassau County [DIA], 2020 NY Slip Op 06745;  County of Nassau v Detectives Assn., Inc., of the Police Dept. of Nassau County, 2020 NY Slip Op 06779;County of Nassau v Police Benevolent Assn. of the Police Dept. of the County of Nassau, 2020 NY Slip Op 06780; and County of Nassau v Police Benevolent… [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Joy
Debates Whether a Veggie Burger Is Really a BurgerMatthews v Ocean Nutrition: Departed employee awarded $1M bonus from company’s sale during notice periodTrudeau government pressed to shield secret operational information in court- Garry J. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:14 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Supreme Court addressed the EEOC’s methods in the 2015 case Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Guest BloggerTabatha Abu El-HajThis summer’s protests following the murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor reveal the costs of an ill-defined right of peaceable assembly. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A New York City police officer [Officer] was charged and found guilty of multiple New York City Police Department patrol guide violations that occurred in five separate incidents in course of a disciplinary hearing conducted by an assistant deputy commissioner [ADC]. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A New York City police officer [Officer] was charged and found guilty of multiple New York City Police Department patrol guide violations that occurred in five separate incidents in course of a disciplinary hearing conducted by an assistant deputy commissioner [ADC]. [read post]
According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, the State’s Human Rights Commissioner, Rebecca Lucero, described the investigation as covering the past ten years of policies, practices, and procedures to determine if the department has engaged in systemic discrimination. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) will hand down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
 heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 Nov [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Ireland’s data protection commissioner has launched an inquiry into the processing of personal data of users of the Tinder dating app. [read post]