Search for: "Taylor v. King"
Results 81 - 100
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Taylor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
Supreme Court issued its 1954 decision declaring racial segregation unconstitutional in Brown v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: john jeremiah sullivan reviews david foster wallace's last novel, "the pale king' ... [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:21 am
Sec’y, HHS, 2010 WL 892250; King v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
King-Washington v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
Constitutional Affairs, Equalities, Home Affairs, Justice and Law – Lord McNally/Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Main Chamber, House of Lords.. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:14 pm
King, 2010 WL 786275 (W.D. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd continued on 30 and 31 October 2017 before Moulder J. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:00 am
London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 4:03 am
Like most people with any knowledge of law, the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Ohio 2010) Diesel Exhaust Exposure King v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
Id.; King, 563 U.S. at 455. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
" Taylor v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Taylor, 733 F.2d 1539 (11th Cir. 1984), abrogated on other grounds, see Scala v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
This post talks about a list of about 120 books on the "black experience" that Judge Don Young ordered to be placed into the Marion, Ohio prison library back in 1972, Taylor v. [read post]
