Search for: "Teague v. Teague"
Results 81 - 100
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
Eighteen years after Mackey, the Court in 1989 again famously (critics would say infamously) adopted Justice Harlan’s suggestions, in Teague v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
” The Court noted that in Teague v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Alabama is retroactive to persons whose convictions and sentences are final and who are seeking collateral review, pursuant to this Court's opinion in Teague v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Jeanette Turner v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Collins v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:00 pm
Montgomery confirms that: Teague [v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
The process that the Court uses to decide whether to make one of its criminal law rulings retroactive, to closed cases, dates from its 1989 ruling in Teague v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:10 am
In essence, the federal rule of Teague v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:24 pm
They could be referring to the procedural default rule, the anti-retroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Related blog posts: $750,000 Jury Verdict in Negligence Associated with Spinal Surgery $3.1 Million Jury Verdict for Death of Patient Following Heart Procedure; Estate of Teague v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Supreme Court today took up for full briefing and argument the case of Welch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am
The majority concluded that the rule that the prisoner was seeking was a new one that didn't apply retroactively under Teague v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:31 pm
The majority decided the issue under the rule of Teague v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 8:51 pm
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
A state can, if it likes, apply a new rule retroactively in its own courts even if the federal rule of Teague v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:22 pm
The state’s highest court turned him down again, having decided in earlier cases that it would apply the Teague v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
In a recent article, Perry Moriearty argued that Miller was a substantive change to the law and thus qualifies for one of Teague v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:27 am
Griffith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:27 am
Griffith v. [read post]
