Search for: "Test v. Test" Results 81 - 100 of 51,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
Markham notes that, under the major questions doctrine, articulated last year by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Exceptions to Fiduciary Advice: Sales Pitches and Investment Education As noted above, unlike its 2016 predecessor, the Final Rule does not provide a specific carveout for recommendations to sophisticated, independent advice recipients on the basis that the DOL believes it is preferable to utilize a facts-and-circumstances test for recommendations to plan sponsor fiduciaries absent an acknowledgment of fiduciary status with respect to the recommendation. [read post]
21 May 2024, 11:17 am by Eileen McDermott
” The decision also said the Supreme Court’s precedent in KSR v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
Schedule I of the CSA imposes a complete criminal ban; schedules II through V allow drugs to be prescribed under certain conditions. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Mar 9, 2023 | Creating a Safe Testing Space for High-Risk AI | Scholars argue for the creation of a regulatory safe space to supplement AI regulations. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 2:55 am by Rose Hughes
This question is most problematic for UK patent law, where the very potentiality of a disclosure (e.g. an unread thesis in library, or a seed drill tested in a field visible from a deserted footpath) is considered novelty destroying (IPKat). [read post]