Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Clements"
Results 81 - 100
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2019, 7:38 am
” “Housing is a Human Right and others told the court Wednesday that Jones Day previously represented People’s Homeless Task Force pro bono in a similar lawsuit, saying that the two organizations comprised substantially the same people and had overlapping missions. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Georgia v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The types of people appointed to the court have also changed. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:42 am
The Bill is in response to the 2018 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas in ConocoPhillips Company et al v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:01 am
Clements v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm
Clement for appellants in Rucho v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm
In PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
They are represented by Kirkland & Ellis, with former Solicitor General Paul Clement as counsel of record. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 18-107, raises the related question of whether that prohibition includes a person’s gender identity so as to protect people from discrimination based on their transgender status. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 3:52 am
Clements. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 8:08 pm
In Hunter et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 pm
” People order priorities differently. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia – Kagan’s former colleague and Clement’s former boss – famously said to those who disagreed with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
by Dennis Crouch In WesternGeco v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:02 pm
The justices’ second argument this morning was WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Corp., a case that requires the justices yet again to consider Section 271 of the Patent Act. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:59 pm
In Encino Motorcars LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:00 am
***In the Waymo v. [read post]