Search for: "U. S. Patent and Trademark Office"
Results 81 - 100
of 389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 11:26 pm
Yesterday three U.S. government agencies--the Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--invited stakeholders to submit comments by early January on a new draft policy statement on standard-essential patents (SEPs).I applaud the Biden Administration for taking--at least this stage--a very centrist position. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:12 am
Trademarks: In FY 2021 the average time from filing to first Office Action in a trademark application more than doubled from the previous year, with the average wait time now 6.3 months to first action. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:20 pm
In May 2014, the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) issued the requested Principal Register registrations—Nos. 4,524,540 and 4,532,073—under Lanham Act § 1(a), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 10:00 am
Patent applications filed under PPH with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) enjoy similar benefits. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 10:27 am
Patent and Trademark Office on July 3, 2002 by SecurityPoint CEO Joseph Ambrefe. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
Patent and Trademark Office and has worked in several intellectual property boutique law firms for the past two and a half decades. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office’s patent eligibility jurisprudence study. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
This article is Part Three of a Three-Part Article Series Artificial intelligence is changing industry and society, and metrics at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reflect its impact. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
This article is Part Two of a Three-Part Article Series Artificial intelligence is changing industry and society, and metrics at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reflect its impact. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
This article is Part One of a Three-Part Article Series Artificial intelligence is changing industry and society, and metrics at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reflect its impact. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office will hold its most recent quarterly meeting of the Patent Public Advisory Committee this Thursday. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
This was largely motivated by pharmaceutical firms’ commercial considerations, i.e. stronger patent protections usually result in higher drug prices. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office now has the discretion to review those APJ decisions. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office will host its first public roundtable on the agency’s plans to implement the Trademark Modernization Act, and agency historian Adam Bisno will host a webinar looking at licensing activities surrounding the first issued U.S. patent. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) demographic data-gathering efforts to better understand the rates at which women, people of color, and lower-income individuals are inventing and patenting. [read post]
12 May 2021, 1:34 am
After Judge Edgar Brinkman's (The Hague) welcome speech, Mary Critharis, the Chief Policy Offier and Director for International Affairs of the United States Patent & Trademark Office originally planned to deliver a keynote address. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 1:15 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Andrei Iancu also filed an amicus brief in the case on the same day in support of Ericsson.... [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:12 am
Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
§ 1117(a), which says: When a violation of any right of the registrant of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office, a violation under section 1125(a) or (d) of this title, or a willful violation under section 1125(c) of this title, shall have been established . . . , the plaintiff shall be entitled, subject to the provisions of section 1111 and 1114 of this title, and subject to the principles of equity, to recover (1) defendant’s… [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 5:44 am
At the same time, the Supreme Court confirms that the practice followed by the Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO) in relation to section 14(4) of the Trademarks Act, where the DKPTO has ex officio rejected trademarks containing very rare names (used by 30 people or less) seems to be a correct implementation of section 14(4). [read post]
