Search for: "U.S. v. Brightful (steven)" Results 81 - 100 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even in the follow-up order in Wheaton College v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Joining in the brief were Steven J. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
"We have left the states with nothing resembling a bright-line rule. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
Three justices, in dissent, would have applied a bright-line bare metal defense, as contended for by petitioners.[4] The majority eschewed both the invariant bare metal defense and the Third Circuit’s infinitely flexible forseeability test, for a “third way. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
” In another story for The National Law Journal (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that Stephen Bright was “surprised” when the Court granted Foster v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am by Marcia Coyle
The justices this week agreed to hear arguments in a new case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Jackson Nichols
In the recent case involving NOAA’s fisheries rule—Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
So now we've got to deal with this grotesque chimera of product liability and misrepresentation set loose to lumber across the California landscape.Just about the only bright side (from our defense-minded perspective) of the whole Conte mess is that apparently a decision by one panel ("division") of the California Court of Appeal has next to no stare decisis effect on other divisions of the Court of Appeal, even within the same appellate district. [read post]