Search for: "U.S. v. Clark (james T.)"
Results 81 - 100
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
The next day, ABC World News was on the story, reporting that 70 percent of U.S. ground beef contained LFTB. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander and one–time U.S. presidential candidate, General Wesley Clark, believes that cyber war exemplifies the tendency for technology to be “ahead of the law” (Adhikari, 2009). [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:36 am
But that doesn't stop me from sympathizing with defense counsel here…SUSAN CARTY v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
James. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
James. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Clark. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
(See McCollum v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:42 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Of this book, the American Monthly reviewer wrote: [T]he work is a rare union of patience, brilliancy, and acuteness, and . . . [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am
Professor James Grimmelmann, aka Master of all things Intellectual Property, chose a classic from the Supreme Court collection of copyright cases, Feist v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decision expected to factor in the case against the department, Clark v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:53 am
Ravens v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
Supreme Court in a 1984 decision, Clark v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:20 am
Supreme Court in a 1984 ruling, Clark v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:04 pm
Supreme Court in a 1984 ruling, Clark v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
Partly this is due to an impoverished concept of property; that property only refers to tangible objects (forgetting about intangibles like stocks, bonds, promissory notes, and other financial instruments), or that copyright can’t be property because infringement doesn’t deprive the holder of possession or ownership (except if I smash your car window, we’d say I violated your property rights even though you still possess the same amount of glass). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Bd.Court: U.S. [read post]
