Search for: "U.S. v. Henning" Results 81 - 100 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 11:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Stiffel Co., 376 U.S.225, 230 (1964) (“[W]hen the patent expires the monopolycreated by it expires, too, and the right to make the article. . . passes to the public. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
District Court for the District of Columbia 1990), in which Judge Joyce Hens Green . . ., in the absence of D.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 (1974), and General Telephone Co. of the Southwest v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:01 pm
Especially in a case like this one, when the sentence that the defendants receive is based almost entirely on conduct for which they were acquitted.Judge Fletcher says that "[w]hen a jury refuses to convict defendants of several counts, but the trial court nonetheless relies on that same acquitted conduct to increase the defendants' sentences sevenfold, the jury has not authorized the resulting sentences in any meaningful sense. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 417 (2007) (quotingSakraida v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent No. 5,324,913 to Oberg and U.S. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
The court relied on general contract principles, as illustrated in the UCC and Restatement, providing that acceptance of non-conforming goods obligates the buyer to pay: [W]hen the U.S. [read post]