Search for: "U.S. v. Polk*" Results 81 - 100 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2007, 2:29 am
The article by Lash entitled "Government Nixes Stem Cell Patents," included text:If [WARF doesn't drop all its claims], however, the case could eventually reach the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Secondary sanctions target transactions conducted by non-U.S. persons outside U.S. jurisdiction (and therefore not in violation of U.S. direct sanctions) by threatening that persons engaging in such transactions may themselves be placed on U.S. sanctions lists. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
  He referred to this as the Glucksberg problem, referencing the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A determination whether to grant such leave is within the Supreme Court’s broad discretion, and the exercise of that discretion will not be lightly disturbed” (Gitlin v Chirinkin, 60 AD3d 901, 902; see U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
In October 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an important decision concerning the extraterritorial application of the U.S. securities laws, Morrison v. [read post]