Search for: "US INVENTOR, INC. v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" Results 81 - 100 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
I, §8, cl. 8, Congress has charged the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) with the task of examining patent applications, 35 U. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:27 am by The Dear Rich Staff
At the time Nolo was founded, if you had invented something but you weren’t ready to file a patent application, there was no effective, fast and cheap way to record your discovery at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Victor Whitmill v Warner Bros (IP Factor) US Trademarks Introducing the Trademarks Dashboard (Director’s Forum) US Trade Marks – Decisions TTAB precedential no. 11: TTAB limits Madrid opposition to goods listed on ESTTA Form, but opposer wins anyway: Hunt Control Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
 If federal law preempts Article 9 with respect to perfection of a security interest, then a financing statement would not be filed and the creditor would need to record the security interest with the appropriate federal office—i.e., the United States Copyright Office (“Copyright Office”) for filings related to copyrights, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office… [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
Global Global – Patents Patent strategy for China (IP Think Strategy) US and UK unite for some more sweet patent harmony (IPKat) Current developments in the Trilateral Patent Offices – EU, Japan and US (Patent Law Practice Center) Africa Bananas are great – but what about wilt-free patents too? [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) False marking lawsuits are real problem for business and make little sense when applied to expired patents (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) USPTO symposium March 11 to bring together women inventors and entrepreneurs (Director’s Forum) Deciding whether to stay a case pending reexamination (Reexamination Alert) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: ABB v Cooper – The broad scope of declaratory judgment jurisdiction (Patently-O)… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by Stefanie Levine
In July of 2006, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) established a trial program with the Japanese Patent Office, where an applicant with an allowed claim in one office could fast track the examination of a corresponding application filed in the other patent office. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Vincent LoTempio
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted an all-time high 219,614 United States utility patents in 2010 – up 31 percent over 2009. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) N D Illinois: Local patent rules do not apply to false marking with expired patents: Zojo Sol’ns., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
United States, 752 F.2d 1538, 1551 (Fed. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm by Kelly
(IPKat) Next lap in Force India vs Ethiad dispute (IPKat) United States US General US election brings IP uncertainty (IP Watch) US Patent Reform Patent Reform still on the table (Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents Bond’s gun a hit at the USPTO (IPKat) Regional patent office coming to a city near you? [read post]