Search for: "US v. Hazel"
Results 81 - 100
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
But the court would not consider Kmart’s attempt to include specific communications and emails from the EEOC that occurred during the conciliation process; Title VII prohibits use of these documents as evidence without written consent, and it granted the EEOC’s motion to strike those communications (EEOC v Kmart Corp, October 15, 2014, Hazel, G). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
Experience has taught however that it sometimes requires more than the passing of legislation to create a new cultural norm .The application of the law may demand conformity from a party to it but does not translate to wide cultural acceptance of an idea and many examples of this abound worldwide, the ongoing debate over the US case of Roe V Wade ,410 U.S. 113 (1973) points out this idiosyncrasy. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Racky, deceased v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 5:52 am
Harwell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:27 pm
Applying the Seventh Circuit’s relevant zoning criterion test – an equal terms violation exists if a religious land use is treated less favorably than a secular land use that is similarly situated to it with respect to the accepted zoning criterion (see River of Life Kingdom Ministries v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:06 am
Carasco v Schlesinger 2022 NY Slip Op 33021(U) September 8, 2022. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
Accountant Paula Huesca had a middle management post with Caterpillar Logistics till she left in August 2010 to take up a senior management position with Quinton Hazell Automotive Limited (QH). [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
General Excavator Co., 290 U.S. 240 (1933), Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm
Hazel. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 10:59 am
Recently the Massachusetts Appeals Court, in Idris I. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
The court also entices us with a footnote in State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Lockett v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Two journalists must pay the president of Ecuador Rafael Correa US$2 million in “moral damages“. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:39 pm
Id. at 7 (citing EEOC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
The rule, which will goes into effect in 60 days, allows for providing investment advice under one of two scenarios: through the use of a computer model certified as unbiased, or through an adviser paid a “level,” or flat, fee that does not change based on investment choices. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Wayne Crawford v. [read post]
