Search for: "US v. Robert Black"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
US has a long history of state lawmakers silencing elected Black officials (Times-Union). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:46 am
US Patent No. 2,043,960. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm
According to The Wrap: Karla Ortiz, a concept artist and illustrator who worked on Marvel films such as “Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Black Panther” and “Doctor Strange,” told the committee that she was “horrified” by how much unauthorized use of her work has popped up on the internet through use of AI. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
It is notable that, as a young DOJ lawyer, Roberts opposed this amendment, which overruled Mobile v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
And, lucky for us, Professor Cliff Sloan has brilliantly documented those years in his forthcoming book "The Court at War. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
The case involved an employment policy that had a disparate impact on Black job applicants. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas replaced Robert Bork on the D.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
The language of colorblindness that Roberts and Thomas use to make their argument comes directly from Justice John Marshall Harlan's lonely dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
" Morever, Justice Gorsuch continued in his majority opinion: "Before us, no party challenges these conclusions. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:26 pm
But few condemn United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
” Cummings v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:15 pm
" Cummings v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:23 pm
In its Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:19 am
The case is Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
But two things are clear: 1) the Court's explicit approval of Bush v. [read post]
