Search for: "US v. Walgreen Co." Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Walgreen Hastings Co., 126 P.2d 774 (N.M. 1998); but see Wilson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:09 pm
Walgreen Co., 88 F.3d 1025, 1031 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
Walgreen, Co., which concerns a Seventh-day Adventist who was fired from Walgreens because he could not attend a training session on his Sabbath, offers the court an opportunity to correct the “undue hardship” standard established in TWA v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Walgreen Co., 18-349, involving employers’ need to make accommodations to their employees’ religious observance; Alito, joined by Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch, filed an opinion concurring in the denial. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:05 am by Accellis Technology Group
We also know how damaging this can be for companies like Epsilon, and the companies that do business with Epsilon (companies like Walgreens, TiVo, Capital One Financial Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Verizon Communications, even Sears). [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am by Bexis
Walgreen Co., No. 12-cv-337-DRH, slip op. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
Walgreen Co., 88 F.3d 1025, 1032 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:22 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Walgreen Co. was a customer of the defendant who filled a prescription for valsartan tablets but was instead given a bottle containing both his prescribed medication as well as lithium tablets. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:22 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Walgreen Co. was a customer of the defendant who filled a prescription for valsartan tablets but was instead given a bottle containing both his prescribed medication as well as lithium tablets. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
(IP finance), Microsoft and Nikon sign patent cross-licensing agreement covering consumer electronics: (Managing Intellectual Property), World day against software patents: (Spicy IP), (IPKat), Patents.com – PatentMonkey redux: (The Patent Librarian’s Notebook), Women and patents: it is not working at the moment: (IAM) Experts discuss the role of IP in environmental technology transfer: (Intellectual Propery Watch), WIPO’s 2008 World Patent Report: (The Patent… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Vocational evidence may be used to address issues relevant to the determination of permanent disability. [read post]